Prerevolutionary Moscow
Moscow has been called the Third Rome by a clergyman who with this name compared it to Rome and Constantinople, both as the centres of big empires and as strongholds of Christianity.
This boast overlooks the fact that Christianity didn’t enter Russian soil through Moscow, but through Kiev, and Moscow only ’inherited’ this self- appointed role after the destruction of the first Russian empire to be, the Kievian Rus, in 1240. During the centuries of Mongolian dominion (the ’yoke’, as it is called in Russia) on Russian soil many small city states/principalities existed, fighting against each other, often with the assistance of Mongolian leaders, who practised the principle ’Divide and rule!’ Among these city states Moscow with time rose to primacy and the Muscovite Grand Dukes took over the task of reuniting the Russian lands, until one of them, Ivan IV, ’the Terrible’ was crowned the first ’Tsar of all Rus’ in 1547.
The buildings in Kolomenskoye belong to the oldest buildings left in Moscow. In former times most Russian buildings, whether houses, or palaces, or churches were from wood and therefore didn’t survive till today.
Slavic settlement in the Moscow area, according to traces left by the first settlers, started in the 11th century. By then the Kievian Rus had been in existence for a while and its Grand Dukes had already converted to Christianity with Vladimir Svatoslavich in 988.
Moscow was first mentioned in a chronicle in 1147. It developed as a trading centre at the connection of the Moskva, Neglinnaya and Yauza rivers. It was also destroyed by the Mongolian invaders in 1238 but quickly recovered. By numerous wars, sieges and battles it gained an extension of territory and independence from the Mongolian khans in the course of the rule of the Grand Dukes Daniil (1276-1303), Ivan Kalita (1328-1341), Dmitri Donskoy (1362-1389), Ivan III. (1462-1505) and Vassili III. (1505-1533).
Other principalities, as the ones of Novgorod, Tver, Rostov and Pskov were incorporated into the Muscovite territory. The Mongolian yoke was thrown off when the Muscovite Grand Dukes felt strong enough to refuse to pay the tribute.
Under the rule of Ivan IV. ’the Terrible’ the Mongolians – in Russian referred to as Tartars – were finally defeated and no longer constituted a threat to Russian rulers. Trade relations were established with Western countries through the port of Kholmogory, nowadays Arkhangelsk, on the White Sea. The conquest of Siberia started. After a time of unrest (the ’smuta’) Russia defeated attempts of Poland to impose its rule and even its catholic faith on Russia. Russia emerged again as a Great power in the time of Peter I (the Great) and after its victory in the battle of Poltava in the Nordic War against Sweden finally gained access to the Baltic Sea which led to the foundation of a new capital, Saint Petersburg.
The Moscow Empire had to fight real enemies in the course of its ascent: Tartars/Mongolians, Lithuanians, the German Knights’ Order, Sweden, and it succeeded in battle and administration.
Moscow, as a city and for a long time the centre of an empire, ideologically had to fight more sophisticated rivals. For a long time, and to a certain extent till today, it has to fight the phantom of the Kievian Rus.
The Muscovites became the ’Great Russians’, the guardians of Orthodoxy and Russian political unity, the Ukrainians became the ’Small Russians’ and an unimportant province in the great Russian Empire. This derogatory point of view persisted in Bolshevik policies during the prerevolutionary times and soviet policy after the takeover of the Communist Party. In the peace of Brest-Litovsk the Soviet Republic easy-mindedly ceded the Ukraine to Germany and Austria, as they had little support there, anyhow.
The tower to the left is the bells’ tower which in Russia was always built apart from the church as it had to fulfil different tasks from the church itself: It had to be more stable, and was exposed to the heavy vibrations of the very heavy bells.
The building between the church and the bell tower, with the green roof, was erected in the 80-ies, in a style cooresponding to the other buildings, perhaps for the housing of the parish priest, of for a school. It is remarkable that in socialist times the authorities tried to adjust somehow to the building’s style as well as to the necessities it wanted to meet.
The Novodevichy Convent
The painter Ilya Repin more than 150 years later has imagined how she must have felt inside the Convent’s walls.
I’d say, she looks quite unhappy, if not to say: outraged.
The Novodevichy cemetery is a cemetery for the famous. Among others here are the graves of the composers Shostakovich and Prokofiev, the writers Chekhov, Gogol and Bulgakov. In the case of Khrushchev, though, it was a sign of disapproval by the Communist Party that made him end up here: He was refused burial inside the Kremlin wall, the final resting place of the other Soviet leaders who succeeded Lenin.
The only other rival after Kiev Moscow had to face was Petersburg after Peter I decided to put his capital there, as a ’Window to the West’. For about 200 years Moscow had to play second fiddle, always envious of the role of the pretender to the throne that it considered its own. The main force clinging to Moscow was the old nobility, the Boyars, whom already Ivan the Terrible had stripped of some of their power, attempting to replace them by a class of ’new nobles’, the ’court’s men’, as the nobles are called nowadays.
The first Russian Tsar has definitely left his brand on Moscow’s architecture and perhaps on Russian political culture. His spirit still lingers in the city. He was a very well-read man, and had a large library that he hid before his death. It has never reappeared, and once in a while people set out to find it – so far in vain.
It is an irony of fate that the traditional role as Russia’s capital was restored to Moscow by the Bolsheviks. After the victory of the October Revolution the new politicians realised that their program wasn’t too popular within the Western Imperialist countries. The latter supported – openly or secretly – various counterinsurgent armies and inflicted a four-year long civil war on revolutionary Russia. For these reasons the Bolshevik leaders decided to transfer the capital of their new state to a less exposed and vulnerable part in the spring of 1918. So Moscow was given back its glory and importance, while Petersburg was stripped of it.
Moscow has been a barrier to dictators of Western Europe. Napoleon took Moscow, but this was the beginning of his defeat. The German army in 1941 got so close that they could see the church towers of Moscow, but with an enormous effort and great loss of life, and the help of the climate Moscow was saved from capture. And in the end the Nazi Empire was defeated in Russia, a fact that has been neglected in the decades of the Cold War ...
Any message or comments?